Proof

In the past couple of days, the lights have been going on at an increasing rate once again. (I love those seasons!) :-)  A young couple came by with their newborn, and we were struck with how pixilated the father was with his little girl. Men not being as relational as women, something very special happens to them when they first encounter their own child.

That got me thinking about Paul’s statement in Philippians 2:20-22. This time. the spot light was shining on the word “proof.”

If the King James Version is any indication, Paul didn’t start using that word until 2nd Corinthians, which is to say, after meeting and spending time with Timothy. I’m not sure he had fully comprehended its full significance yet in 2nd Corinthians, but by the time he got to writing the Philippians, he seems to have finally comprehended the full proof!

It took him a while to get the proof, or to find out what the proof even was. In short, on his first missionary trips out, he hadn’t so much as heard there was a ‘proof.’

Then on Saturday, an older couple visited. They both “Get It.” And in our conversation with them, more light was poured into me. I felt like the old guy who saw the baby Jesus and said, “… now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word: For mine eyes have seen thy salvation, Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people; A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.” 

Another song that beautifully illustrates this truth is Michael Card’s song, “Now That I’ve Held Him In My Arms.”

Elsewhere it is written: “For unto us a child is born…” 

For us males, proof comes when we hold a child in our arms. Up to then it’s all theories – all systems, all deals, all in the head with little or no meaningful or “proving” revelation in the heart.

In short then, as in our own day, Paul began his apostolic or ‘missionary’ journeys with unproven content. By now what has been calling itself ‘church,’ even ‘cutting edge church,’ is still dead. “But in the fullness of time God sent forth His son born of a woman, born of the law…”

Until the full significance of this gets dropped into the lap of our experience, we don’t yet possess the proof. If we have no proof, leaving home apparently does more harm than good.

Are you with me so far?

This older man I mentioned shared how impacted he was the first time his baby was place in his arms. (more confirmation)  Then he shared a song that almost had it right, with something in the lyrics about ‘first love.” Where the song goes wrong, however, was in suggesting that ‘one time’ will be sufficient to get it all, and have it stick.

In my experience, that’s not how it works. This whole matter is a transaction of the cross, where our old ways, perceptions and values die, and His new way comes alive in us. Once is not enough. It takes death and resurrection all day long, to live in the reality of ‘first love’ all day long. Every time we think we have it and can do it on our own, we need to be reminded that even Paul was “determined to know nothing among you except Jesus and Him crucified.”

The Corinthians were not so easy to love, and Paul needed resurrected, experiential proof ‘all day long’ to love them with God’s love all day long. It took his relationship with Timothy to prove that for Paul. I think it takes no less than that for us. We need to hold a child who The Lord has given to us here and now. Many are in denial about such a possibility, and especially about such a possibility gender neutral. To that kind of orthodox error, those who have experienced the proof appear to be heretics.

Okay – enough for now, I hope to get into this matter of truth and heresy while I’m undergoing chemotherapy a little later this morning. I need to further explore the Truth in connection with the parallels between orthodox medicine vs. alternative medicine, and orthodox “church” vs. alternative Church

The difference is in what Paul explained about Timothy, “… I have no one else like him, who will show genuine concern for your welfare. For everyone looks out for their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ.”

Agendas other than Jesus Christ and his Lordship are destroying and misrepresenting true spiritual relationship.

More about that in the next post. :-)

Love!

By Jay Ferris, originally posted February 13, 2013

Posted in J.Ferris: Reposts with Notes | Leave a comment

Rejection – a Tell Tale Sign!

TRUTH: “For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him. You have done a foolish thing, and from now on you will be at war,”  2 Chronicles 16:9.

The “eyes of the Lord” are looking for those who embrace the truth – all of the truth. Jerusalem not only rejected all of the TRUTH, but crucified it.  Just what is it about TRUTH that makes it so unpalatable? It is hidden agenda. The rejection of TRUTH reveals hidden agenda. It is then just a matter of discerning what that hidden agenda is. Both Biblically and experientially, even to the searching of our own hearts, the root problem is the desire for preeminence and center stage, 3 John 9.   The root cause is feeling “less than,” or in other words, an identity crisis.  This is the crisis that made the couple in the Garden of Eden vulnerable to the serpent’s temptation to eat the wrong stuff in order to be “like God.”

The Remedy for “less than” is the Revelation of The Cross. This is the place where we discover the redefined love of God, ie.e. the redefined “agape” of God.

That is the foundation stone of “more than,” Romans 8:37.  It is there, and only there, where hidden agendas have any chance of being taken captive.

Of course it is possible to be rejected for communicating error, but it is just as possible, and perhaps even more so, for communicating TRUTH.  The history of what’s been calling itself “church” (including “reformation church,” “cutting edge church,” and even “revival church”) is all proof enough of the ongoing rejection of TRUTH. All of these brands of “church” have mud on their feet from where they have been. It is right here that the need for foot washing comes into its most important revelation.

Rejection of Truth tells tales on hidden agendas.

Love!

  • By Jay Ferris, originally published January 2012
Posted in J.Ferris: Reposts with Notes | 1 Comment

Change in Covenants

The Old Covenant was of the letter and was made obsolete at or by the cross, in either case, by the time the Spirit came in a new way at Pentecost.

The New Covenant came in, by, and with the Spirit at Pentecost.

The Old Covenant was of the letter – a matter of words.

The New Covenant was, and is, of the Spirit – a matter of the Spirit.

The problem comes when we try to reduce to words what can only happen in and by the Spirit. This takes us back in time to the letter – even letters that kill, and away from the Spirit who gives life.

I believe this is what happened early on after Pentecost, like within the first 100 years, for instance, The self appointed experts tried to reduce to words what had happened in the Spirit and the result was the Dark Ages. Now as then, our feeble attempts to reduce the work of The Spirit to words always takes us to the “Dark Side.”

If we can only take the time to discern whether or not a person is in a Spiritual place to receive our verbal communication or attempts to communicate where we might be in the Spirit, then it is better to wait until a more opportune time – You know, kind of like what Jesus did at The Last Supper – “I have more to say to you, but you are not yet ready to receive it…”

  • By Jay Ferris, originally posted February 2012
Posted in J.Ferris: Reposts with Notes | 3 Comments